Pentecost 3, 2025
1 Kings 19:15-16,19-21
Psalm 16
Galatians 5:1,13-25
Luke 9:51-62
In the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Amen.
So, you probably have at least one story of a big misunderstanding in your family. I know we have had some doozies in mine. A story that is the stuff of legend goes back to my parents’ wedding day. Grandma Baum missed the receiving line after the recessional because she went out to buy the beer, as it was agreed. (I guess because she was the German mom?) By the time she got back, she had missed all the greeting and congratulating. She was sure that Grandma McArdle had orchestrated the whole thing, to get the receiving line all to herself. And she was also convinced that all future difficulties with her son were because she was not at that receiving line.
The fact that their children were married did nothing to smooth over the rough spots. This was the beginning of a relationship founded on mistrust and anger and misunderstanding. And there was nothing anyone could say that would change things. Grandma Baum spent her whole life looking back to that day in 1958, and it became the basis for her relationship with Grandma McArdle until the day she died. Sadly, my grandmother was robbed of joy later in life because she continuously looked back in anger to that one particular day and to the strained relationship that grew out of it.
In some ways, today’s gospel is about holding a grudge, and looking back. Or, more accurately, about not looking back. But first, as we heard:
When the days drew near for Jesus to be taken up, he set his face to go to Jerusalem.
This might be the most important moment in Luke’s gospel up to this point. Jesus has turned toward Jerusalem. And we know what this means, because we have just walked with him through this journey during Holy Week. Jesus has set his face to go to Jerusalem, because the time for him to be lifted up is drawing near. Jesus is going to Jerusalem to experience the worst that is in us, followed by the best that is in God. From our crucifixion to God’s resurrection; there can be no larger divide in all creation.
So Jesus is heading for Jerusalem, and he sends out an advance team to make a town ready for him along the way. But they did not receive him. So the disciples ask, “Lord, do you want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume” the Samaritans in that village? Jesus turns and rebukes them, and they go on to another village.
Now if you look in a Bible with chapter headings inserted, it probably says something like “A Samaritan town rejects Jesus,” or “Samaritan Opposition.” And those little titles are not surprising, since the Samaritans and Jews had a long-standing disagreement about where the faithful should worship. To a Samaritan, a person going up to worship should be headed for Mount Gerizim, not Mount Zion. To Samaritans, a person whose face was set toward Jerusalem would be heading to the wrong temple. So we naturally assume that Luke is saying the Samaritan town rejected Jesus, and that’s why the disciples offer to pour hot rain on their heads.
But that’s not what is happening here. When you look at the pronouns in the original language, the people who did not receive Jesus were the messengers he sent on ahead. It was not that the Samaritans rejected him; it was that his advance team never received him, because his face was set toward Jerusalem. Jesus was not rejected in this town; he was headed to a different destination.
So why does this distinction matter? Why should we care whether or not the Samaritans rejected Jesus? Well, it matters because of the reaction of the disciples. They would know that Jesus had not been rejected by this town. Jesus and his friends are just walking past this town, and—apropos of nothing—James and John ask, “Lord, do you want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them?” (James and John weren’t called the “Sons of Thunder” for nothing.) You know what I think happened?
I think the disciples had spent their whole lives nursing their hatred for Samaritans. And now that Jesus is heading for Jerusalem, they are feeling full of themselves. For as long as anyone could remember, the Samaritans had been nothing but trouble, looking down their noses at the Israelites for worshipping in the wrong place. Well, now that Jesus is heading for Jerusalem to take charge, James and John think this is the perfect moment to rain down a little fire on the heads of their religious rivals. Surely, Jesus will commend them for having the presence of mind to stick their collective thumb in the eye of the Samaritans. Right?
Of course, what James and John don’t get (and what we often forget) is that Jesus is not the latest installment in How To Get My Religious Revenge. Jesus is not going to Jerusalem in order to settle the score, or to set up an earthly kingdom, or even to offer the regular temple offerings dictated his Jewish faith. No, Jesus is going to Jerusalem in order to be the offering that will make all religious systems irrelevant. Jesus sets his face toward Jerusalem to bring an end to the whole mess.
And it’s a good thing too. Since, as we can see, the religious followers of Jesus are as likely to call down fire from heaven as they are to say, “God bless you” while walking past. It seems to be in our human nature when we are filled with zeal to take it out on people of other faiths. We see it in today’s gospel; we see it in today’s newspapers. We condemn the “wrong” religious faiths, and feel justified in offering to smite them for Jesus, all the while living in fear of being smitten in the name of their God. (Which is the same God as ours, I might add.) There is nothing to get the anger and violence flowing like a little disagreement over the love of God.
But Jesus rebukes us right along with the disciples on the road with him. Jesus rebukes us all and then says, let us continue on toward Jerusalem. His face is set, and we are to follow. Don’t look back at the disagreements that have spoiled your relationships in the past. There is a new day because of Jesus. And we are to follow him to Jerusalem.
So, we have seen that being a disciple of Jesus does not mean calling down fire from heaven on people as you walk past. Then there are three additional encounters with “disciple hopefuls.” Jesus warns the first that he himself has nowhere to lay his head. Of course, Jesus doesn’t mean he sleeps on the ground at night. (After all, in the very next chapter he is eating at the home of Mary and Martha.) Rather, Jesus is showing how isolated he is from those around him. He is not talking about where he will lie down at night; he is trying to express what it means for him to be heading for Jerusalem.
Then, one guy says he will follow, but first has to go and bury his father. Jesus responds that he should let the dead bury their own dead. It sounds harsh to us, I know. But Jesus is not telling the guy to skip out on the funeral arrangements. The man is saying he wants to go home and wait for his father to die so he can bury him. You know, could be a week, could be 30 years. In other words, the man is saying, “I’ll follow you . . . uh . . . some day.” Jesus tells the man to let the dead bury the dead and—more importantly—to go and proclaim the kingdom of God. That is, don’t sit around waiting for people to die. Proclaim the good news now, especially since those who are going to die are the ones who need to hear that message! Get out of this culture of vengeance and death (the culture that would rain down fire on your enemies). Instead, proclaim the kingdom of God, and the dead will take care of themselves . . . by being raised up!
The third response is perhaps the most interesting. Here Jesus uses the image of a farmer setting about the task of plowing a field. Jesus says no one who puts a hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the kingdom. (I don’t know much about farming, but I’m guessing you can’t plow a field looking backwards.) A farmer would need to keep the eyes focused forward. Perhaps keeping an eye trained on a tree at the other end of the field. Face set forward, not looking back, eye on the tree outside the fence. It calls to mind Jesus, with his face set toward Jerusalem, not looking back, eye on a tree on a hill outside of town.
So, today’s gospel reading starts with Jesus setting his face and not looking back. And it ends with Jesus telling those who would follow not to look back.
Well, look back at what? I think the answer lies in the example of James and John, and maybe my own Grandmother. The never-ending grudge, carried to one’s grave. Looking back in anger is looking away from Jerusalem, where Jesus would be raised up those three times, where God’s redemption for all people would be proclaimed in no uncertain terms. To follow Jesus is to follow him forward to the cross, forward to the empty tomb, forward to his ascension. To look back is to focus on petty squabbles, to destroy relationships through misunderstanding and disagreement, to wish violent death upon those we dislike, to go back to a system based on power, wealth, violence, and hatred.
The way forward is the promise of the resurrection, by way of the tomb. In death and resurrection, all arguments are left behind. The way of redemption and forgiveness transforms our relationships from anger and mistrust. Putting your hand to the plow is putting your trust in Jesus, keeping your eye on the tree outside Jerusalem, knowing that life is only found in following Jesus into death. And that is the kingdom we are to proclaim. God has put an end to the power of death. And not only is that truly good news, it might just be the only truly good news.
Amen.